When it comes to employee appraisals, it’s hard to pick which performance management template to use. If your template is too open-ended and doesn’t have enough structure, your responses could lead to biased or subjective evaluations. On the other hand, if your template is too rigid, responses can lack context, and the review might be unfair.
To successfully support your people and encourage growth, your performance management templates need to be balanced in objectivity and accuracy. Whether it’s a self-assessment or a standard top-down review, ensure your templates are standardized, structured, and impartial.
Need some ideas to get started? Below are five popular performance management templates you can use to elevate your reviews.
The self-evaluation is one of the most popular performance management templates used in the review process. It’s also one of the most integral parts of the review process, as it gives employees a chance to reflect on their accomplishments, check in on their progress, and advocate for themselves.
Self-evaluations can come in many different shapes and sizes. Some organizations leverage a Likert scale or scoring system used to rank performance on a number of indicators. In other cases, performance reviews are entirely open-ended.
Likert scales are best for questions that can be answered in a linear range of intensities. (Source)
Whatever employee self-assessment methods you decide to use, ensure each and every person in the company receives the same template. This doesn’t mean the exact same self-assessment -- an Account Executive should not be asked to fill out responses on the same behaviors or goals as a PR Strategist. Using the same type of template creates a level of standardization in your reviews that can be useful later on for reporting and analysis.
While crafting your self-evaluation forms, make sure they are:
Your people are more than just their OKRs and KPIs. Have a system of self-evaluation that accounts for well-rounded professional growth.
360 reviews are another popular type of performance management template. These evaluations are designed to collect feedback from people who work with an employee, like immediate teammates, functional managers, and other colleagues. The idea is that a collection of feedback from different stakeholders creates a more holistic review while arming managers to suss through any personal biases or unfair remarks. In short, these evaluations provide a “360-degree view” from all angles.
If you’re thinking of deploying a 360 review strategy, try following this simple format:
With 360 reviews, it’s imperative to have guidance and limitations to the questions you ask. Providing an objective set of prompts and questions can eliminate prejudices, while tangential open feedback forums can help give managers context come review time.
The first 90 days of a new employee’s experience are arguably the most important: these three months are integral for them to successfully adjust to the company, their new roles, and their new teammates.
ChartHop provides new employees with a platform to manage all of their onboarding needs, including a 90-day plan. From there, you can use it to host consistent reviews at the 30, 60, and 90-day marks. Rather than having a single 90-day review, having a monthly cadence can help keep employees on track to success while providing their managers a better sense of what’s going on. Some things to keep in mind:
Most people think of performance reviews as a means to track progress against objectives or set tasks. However, if your company wants to prioritize holistic professional development consider adopting a competency-based performance management template.
For example, at ChartHop, we encourage our people to embrace transparency, ownership, agility, empathy, and customer service. Using these values, we could create a template to account for each “core competency” and their related behaviors. So, in addition to evaluating how well someone displays “Ownership,” we might create and rank behavioral indicators that contribute to that core competency as a whole. Using a Likert scale, we could rank tangential statements, such as:
Performance management should be an ongoing, consistent initiative. More and more, progressive companies are recognizing that annual or bi-annual reviews aren’t enough to successfully motivate their employees. Instead, managers should be having two-way conversations consistently, eliminating any potential for surprises.
1:1 meetings between employees and their functional managers are an easy way to foster connection, encourage feedback, and ensure everyone is looped in. At ChartHop, our managers meet with their people weekly via Zoom and use a template included in our platform to steer the conversation.
With ChartHop, you can customize your 1:1 performance management templates to include open-ended questions, such as:
Again, this eliminates any surprises. With this feedback form, you have everything you need to collaborate candidly on the week ahead.
There are virtually thousands of performance review templates to explore and integrate into your performance management strategy. None are right or wrong, necessarily -- it all depends on the unique needs and goals of your organization.
Whatever template you decide to use, keep it consistent across the company, make it bi-directional, and have a place like ChartHop to record and create an actionable plan. This way, your performance management strategy and people can thrive together.